Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Schmidt's avatar

Love the content and deep-dives, which is why I subscribed. FWIW, if I didn’t put it on the company card, I wouldn’t have done the pay model. IMHO, especially compared to other substacks I pay for, it’s steep…and I think too steep for a rank-and-file beer employee to consider these days (sorry, I know pricing your valuable time is highly personal…just responding from today’s request for feedback).

Expand full comment
Jeff Alworth's avatar

On the monetization front, Substack has a one-size model—and it doesn’t fit all. I cast around a long time to find an approach that fit my needs: needing some remuneration to support the work, needing a solution that didn’t require a lot of my time to maintain, and also wanting a clean, wholly open-access site free of annoyances.

For writers working in niche subjects, the sponsorship model is an excellent solution. At Beervana, I do an annual sponsorship with companies I admire (so far it’s only been breweries). We all have relatively small reaches, but if you’re doing a good job, you’re hitting exactly the audience many companies desire. I know that’s true with Beer Crunchers. It’s a small investment of time to do annual asks, and then it’s done for the year. And no annoying ads!

I suspect that, like me, you’d like to reach the widest audience. Substack’s model isn’t designed for that. It does, however, allow for serious supporters to offer some revenue (I have a ko-fi account for that), which is also gratifying.

Just a thought—

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts